Superman (2025) - Review: A New Hope

 

In all the marketing leading up to the release of writer/director James Gunn’s (“Guardians of the Galaxy,” “The Suicide Squad”) “Superman” film, the first in a new cinematic universe for DC and Warner Bros., there has been heavy use of John Williams’s theme from the 1978 “Superman” film. While some could view this as a nostalgic ploy, in reality it seems to have been something much different. While nostalgia may be an element, it's clear that the use of that music was a sign more than anything; a signal that this new version of the Kryptonian and this latest film is far closer to Christopher Reeves’s first adventure in red and blue spandex than we could have thought.

Set three decades after the destruction of Krypton and his arrival on Earth, the film follows the titular Superman, played by David Corenswet (“Pearl,” “The Politician”), as he attempts to balance his desire to help humanity with increasing efforts from Lex Luthor, played by Nicholas Hoult (“Mad Max: Fury Road,” “Nosferatu”), to turn public opinion against him. Meanwhile, he attempts to keep his relationships with fellow Daily Planet reporter Lois Lane, played by Rachel Brosnan (“The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel,” “I’m Your Woman”), photographer Jimmy Olsen, played by Skyler Gisondo (“Licorice Pizza,” “Booksmart”), and the budding Justice Gang made up of Green Lantern corps member Guy Gardner, Hawkgirl, and Mr. Terrific, played by Nathan Fillion (“Firefly,” “The Rookie”), Isabela Merced (“Instant Family,” “Dora and the Lost City of Gold”), and Edi Gathegi (“X-Men: First Class,” “The Harder They Fall”), respectively. Oh, and also there’s Supe’s beloved mangy superpowered dog, Krypto.

Gunn’s vision of this new universe is immediately refreshing for numerous reasons, but the best of them is the immediacy. He understands that we know who Clark, Lex, Lois, and the rest of the gang are. We don’t need to see the death of Krypton all over again, and it means that the film we get has a greater sense of momentum right away. We can just jump straight into a tale virtually while its being told, and it makes for a more interesting story as a result. We’re forced to piece together the reality of these characters and their world, allowing us to engage with the material more easily. It also means that, put simply, Gunn can use some of the more fun elements of this world and these characters that require those built out relationships from the start.

Corenswet simply fades into the role, keeping the bright, cheery persona of the son of Krypton present, but allowing a more frustrated and emotional side to shine through. He’s a delight, and there’s a physicality and expressiveness in the action sequences that feel particularly bright as well. He has an almost cartoonish ability to seem like an impenetrable wall while also maintaining a lightness that makes you believe he cares enough to prevent a stray dog from being crushed by a building. His chemistry with Brosnan is excellent as well, and a scene between the pair of them involving an impromptu interview is one of the best in the entire film. Brosnan’s charm and attitude makes her Lois a fantastic one, and she slots right into a modern-day version of the character without losing any of her 60s go-getter charm.

The Justice Gang are an excellent bunch of cohorts to play off of Superman, given their markedly different position compared to him, and the trio of actors are excellent portrayals of them. Fillion and Merced are great, so much so that it’s disappointing they aren’t used more than they are. Gathegi completely steals the show as Mr. Terrific, full of quips and brutal smarts that means he continues Gunn’s streak of turning lesser known characters into fan favorites. Like Gathegi, Hoult is an absolute scene stealer and arguably the highlight of a film full of highlights. He makes Lex a refreshingly simply villain, someone you love to hate and who hates just because he can. There’s clearly a complexity under the surface, but he relishes playing him as a cut and dry villain with glee.

Despite having plenty going on and a game cast here to do it all, the biggest weakness of Gunn’s film is just having so much going on. It isn’t that it all feels overstuffed, as the runtime and pacing are remarkably smooth for a modern blockbuster. Rather Gunn has written himself a double-edged sword: his characters are written in such a charming way that the handful that don’t get as much screen time sting more. You want to spend more time with them simply because they come off so well. It’s not hard to see a version of the film with an extra half-hour added on simply to spend more time with Gisondo, Merced, Fillion, or other characters like Pruitt Taylor Vince (“Lady in the Lake,” “Gotti”) and Neva Howell (“Ghosts of the Ozark”) as Ma and Pa Kent, respectively, Wendell Pierce (“The Wire,” “Selma”) as Daily Planet editor Perry White, or Sara Sampaio as surprise comedic standout Eve Teschmacher, the on-and-off girlfriend of Lex Luthor.

Those characters don’t feel as though they’ve been given less time as an excuse for future installments however. Gunn’s script keeps making sure everyone ties back around to Superman’s own arc. It all comes back to Supes, and it's a remarkably focused film in that way. However, that doesn’t mean things don’t get to be just as rollicking and fun as an episode of the titular hero’s early-2000s animated television series. The gorgeous locals pop with candy-colored glee, and nothing feels drab. It’s colorful without being garish, and the entire film is lit with almost hyper realism. It feels like a living comic book in the best possible way, shot with varying calmness and excited glee by cinematographer Henry Braham (“The Suicide Squad,” “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3”). Even the action sequences seem to be ripped straight from the thin pages of a monthly serial, with an elasticity and buoyancy that’s fitting of the superhuman nature of its lead. All the while, John Murphy (“28 Days Later,” “The Suicide Squad”) and David Fleming’s (“The Last of Us (2023),” “Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2024)”) score rocks along with equal parts emotional strings and shredding guitars.

What’s most interesting is that, in a Hollywood film which is meant to be the launching point of a brand-new cinematic universe, with hundreds of millions of marketing dollars pumped into it, and utilizing one of the most recognizable characters in media history, Gunn has somehow gotten away with making an exceptionally politically minded film. Plain and simple, there are pertent themes and identifiers that make this a Superman film for this exact moment, and it doesn’t appear that any of this was reined in by executives. It becomes a refreshingly honest piece of media and makes those themes stick even more than they would if Gunn had decided to dance around it all. He seems to remember that, regardless of whether the viewer is a child or an adult, the audience doesn’t like being talked down to and can recognize themes like this if they’re handled correctly. The material doesn’t dampen the morals or empathy or hope that sits at the core of the film or Superman’s character either. Rather it enhances it and makes it that much stronger, like a sweet piece of candy at the end of a long and savory meal.

Those added themes and effort to make it more than just surface level heroism speak to the extra effort Gunn puts into his projects that makes them that much better. It isn’t just that Clark and Lois’s romance is present; it's that it feels romantic and real. It isn’t just that Superman has that sense of duty and hope; it’s that it feels earnest and real. It can be easy to throw these characters on screen and call it a day, for someone to say, “I put a man in red and blue spandex and made him fly, isn’t that enough?” And for a cursory glance with half attention paid on a cable channel on a Tuesday evening, maybe that is enough. But Gunn knows that to most, these characters are real. Putting that effort in, even if the film as a result might feel like it's bursting at the seams, is the right thing to do. It feels real.

There’s a phrase that’s come about recently to describe a subgenre of media that, while it’s always existed, has become more prevalent in recent years. “Hopepunk” has been used to describe works as recent as “Free Guy,” “Wall-E,” “Mad Max: Fury Road,” and “Isle of Dogs” and as timeless as “The Lord of the Rings” and “Star Wars.” The idea that, against radical violence and hate, sometimes hope is the punk rock response. James Gunn’s “Superman is, if nothing else, the perfect embodiment of this. It doesn’t wear its heart on its sleeve so much as it has armor made of it. The film’s central message of hope and empathy beats true throughout a fun and fantastic adventure that keeps things just campy enough without sacrificing any sense of self-seriousness. Corenswet is a perfect Clark and a better Superman, and Gunn’s entire ensemble is electric. The script is packed tight with nuance and timely themes that nevertheless feel right out of the golden age of Superman’s best comic book years. There’s a lot here, maybe too much, but it's clear that every character, moment, and fight are there for one reason: to further Superman’s arc and journey. You will believe a man can fly. 5/5

Jurassic World: Rebirth - Review: New Age, Same Stuff

 

It’s hard to believe but there was a period where, like other classic blockbuster franchises, we didn’t have a “Jurassic Park” movie every few years. But ever since “Jurassic World” stomped into theaters back in 2015 with a record-breaking global opening weekend of over $500 million, Universal has been dead set on making sure this series continues on no matter what. And after 2022’s lucrative dud “Jurassic World: Dominion,” they’ve returned to the well with an all-new cast and an all-too familiar premise with “Jurassic World: Rebirth.”

Set over a decade after the events of “Jurassic World” and well into the time when dinosaurs have begun to re-roam the Earth again, the film follows covert ops expert Zora Bennett, played by Scarlett Johansson (“Marriage Story,” “Jojo Rabbit”), as she’s recruited by pharmaceutical exec Martin Krebs, played by Rupert Friend (“Pride & Prejudice (2005),” “Anatomy of a Scandal”), to lead a secret mission to Ile Saint-Hubert to extract the DNA from three living dinosaurs to synthesize into a drug to prevent heart disease. Her team consists of nerdy paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis, played by Jonathan Bailey (“Bridgerton,” “Wicked (2024)”) and team leader Duncan Kincaid, played by Mahershala Ali (“Moonlight,” “Green Book”). While on the island, they also run into a shipwrecked family consisting of father Reuben, played by Manuel Garcia-Rulfo (“A Man Called Otto,” “The Magnificent Seven (2016)”), his daughters Teresa and Isabella, played by Luna Blaise (“Manifest,” “Aristotle and Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe”) and Audrina Miranda respectively, and Teresa’s boyfriend Xavier, played by David Iacono (“The Summer I Turned Pretty,” “Dead Boy Detectives”).

Given his experience playing with large scales in previous works, it's no surprise that director Gareth Edwards (“The Creator,” “Rogue One”) has an excellent handle on the chaos as it unfolds in this tale. His film has a very clear-sighted vision, ditching any semblance of shaky-cam effects or muddied action. It’s a gorgeously shot film as well, that plays with camera angles in plenty of ways that would make Spielberg proud. The musical score from Alexandre Desplat (“Little Women (2019),” “Fantastic Mr. Fox”) maintains a playful tone, mixing in well-trodden themes from previous “Park” films while still mixing in new material throughout.

Davis Koepp’s (“Spider-Man (2002),” “Jurassic Park”) script, meanwhile, is a less than excellent affair. While the moment-to-moment dialogue is fine enough, with a handful of clunkers thrown in, the overall plotting is nothing the series hasn’t seen before. It’s fine enough, but it feels as though it’s a stitched together movie made from chunks of previous films. It doesn’t mean they don’t work, but there’s a pervasive feeling of deja vu throughout the whole picture. Johansson is great, but feels like a female version of Chris Pratt’s character. Ali is great, but he feels like a slightly more sane version of Bob Peck’s character from the original film. Bailey is one of the film’s largest saving graces; his charism and genuine interest in the dinos and material shine through and deliver one of the best characters in the series. But at the same time, there are clear and obvious shades of both Dr. Grant and Dr. Sattler in his character that are hard to overlook.

Worse than that, the family sharing the film’s spotlight are unfortunately just plain boring. Anytime the film cuts away from the main team to them, the tension dissipates, and their scenes feel as though they have zero consequence on the overall plot. They’re performed fine enough, and Garcia-Rulfo is doing some great work with a fairly generic character, but so much of their screen time is spent wondering what the other, more interesting and complex characters are up to. 

But does any of this really matter? This is, at the end of the day, another “Jurassic World” movie. If it delivers the dinos, then the audience will come, and they’ll enjoy it. There is certainly fun to be had as the film does deliver the goods. A moment in the middle of the film involving Bailey’s character and a Titanosaur is moving and wonderful. The entire last thirty minutes inside of an abandoned company town are a lot of fun. But it's all grizzly, bloody, mean fun. The whimsy of the original film and even the first “World” film are completely gone. The fun of the parks and seeing humans interact with dinosaurs is completely absent, save for the one scene with Bailey. The dinosaurs are also borderline alien at this point, with most being bizarre hodgepodges waved off as “mutations” without their own names. It just feels disheartening to see a series that used to be about science gone wrong combined with the joy of the Jurassic age turned into a glorified kaiju film series.

This latest film opens with some text describing a world “disillusioned with dinosaurs” and it feels as though the filmmakers are as well. “Jurassic World: Rebirth” is a film that can’t be called bad, but nothing about it stands apart. Koepp’s script is a stitched together combination of various other elements from other films in the series with a boring familial subplot for good measure. The technical elements are great, and Edwards clearly has a directorial passion that equals that of Bailey’s excellent character. But for a series that started with one of the greatest blockbusters of all time, it's disheartening to see it come to this. It is still a massive step up from “Dominion,” but the film executives were so concerned with whether or not they could keep the series going, they never stopped to think if they should. 2.5/5

M3GAN 2.0 - Review: The Bot is Back, for Better or Worse

Blumhouse is certainly no stranger to sequels or “lightening in a bottle” concepts. If it's a hit, it's likely going to get a sequel since most of the studio’s films have micro-budgets compared to other Hollywood studio fare. So, while a paltry $181 million gross might seem like tipping money to some studios, for a Blumhouse film with only a $12 million budget like 2022’s “M3GAN,” it's a rich vein to strike again and again. And again they have struck, with a sequel aptly titled “M3GAN 2.0” that is decidedly less horror than the first film or the rest of the studio’s fare. If the first film was “Child’s Play,” this one is far more “T2: Judgement Day” or “Mission: Impossible” than it is “Child’s Play 2.”

The film follows the titular killer android M3GAN, played again physically by Amie Donald and voiced again by Jenna Davis (“Treehouse Detectives,” “Chicken Girls”), newly rebuilt by her creator Gemma, played by Allison Williams (“Girls,” “Get Out”), after being destroyed at the end of the first film. Gemma wants to use M3GAN to find and defeat a rogue military android named AMELIA, played by Ivanna Sakhno (“Ahsoka,” “The Spy Who Dumped Me”), who’s hunting down and killing each person involved with her creation, including Gemma as she was based on M3GAN’s original design. Also reprising their roles are Violet McGraw (“The Haunting of Hill House,” “Separation”) as Cady, Gemma’s niece and M3GAN’s original owner, Jen Van Epps (“Don’t Make Me Go,” “One Lane Bridge”) as Tess, one of Gemma’s co-workers, and Brian Jordan Alvarez (“English Teacher,” “80 for Brady”) as Cole, one of Gemma’s other co-workers.

Returning director Gerard Johnstone (“The Jaquie Brown Diaries,” “Housebound”), who now also is on as a co-writer, and returning writer Akela Cooper (“Malignant,” “The Nun 2”) have certainly crafted a work that makes large creative changes from the original material. The campiness, silly nature of the original film is still here, but far more intentionally than the “happy accident” nature of the first film’s viral moments. Therefore, while things are certainly campier than even before, it can feel more manufactured than the first film’s more natural silliness. It doesn’t help that the film is longer than the first and lacks the tight focus from M3GAN’s original rampage, bringing in numerous additional characters and subplots that manage to be either boring or actively unfunny. 

A borderline cameo from Jermaine Clement (“Flight of the Conchords,” “What We Do In the Shadows”) as a tech-obsessed billionaire feels completely out of step with the rest of the film’s sense of humor, and the third act of the film forgets Tess exists and has Cole take a larger spotlight that doesn’t fit the character. That’s not even mentioning the completely forgettable FBI agents that pop up before Johnstone and Cooper completely forget about them until the last ten minutes. That’s not even getting into the completely nonsensical central threat that, when revealed, feels as though it was thought up by someone who saw “Mission: Impossible: The Final Reckoning” and wanted to dumb it way way down.

Luckily, when the film does refocus on Gemma, Cady, and M3GAN on their quest, things are far more entertaining. M3GAN’s emotional journey here is surprisingly satisfying, without sacrificing any of her snark and attitude, with Davis’s vocal performance working exceptionally well. Williams and McGraw get a more standard “parent and teen child butt heads” plotline, and it works well enough, without ever working beyond basic levels. Sakhno is a fantastically fun addition to the cast, working well against Donald and Davis and injecting a fun adversarial relationship into the fare.

As a whole, the film looks like its budget, with a large assortment of average soundstage-built sets and some garish green screen for a few open landscape action sequences. Despite the shift to action from horror, Johnstone and his team have fun with the fight sequences, taking gleeful advantage of the fact that their heroine and villainess are both robotic, throwing logic out the window. By the time the third act hits, any semblance of realism has been completely ejected in favor of a freewheeling junk food type of cinematic fun. It’s certainly nothing groundbreaking, but when firing on all cylinders, it's undeniably a good time.

“M3GAN 2.0” changes a great deal from the original film, and while it's still absolutely a fun and campy time, it's certainly not without its own issues. For every action sequence and borderline spy parody featuring M3GAN, there’s another with an utterly forgettable character or plot point. This sequel simply can’t hold a candle to the simplicity, tension, or inadvertent camp of the first film. It’s cinematic junk food that invites you to turn off your brain and go along for the ride. There are certainly still other better examples of cinematic junk food out there, but you’ll still have a good time with this psychotic robot regardless. 3/5

F1 - Review: The Need for Speed

 

“Dad movies” is a turn of phrase often used to describe blockbusters simply about “guys being dudes,” often involving big cars and/or vehicles, big muscles, and big emotions. Movies like “Top Gun,” “Gladiator,” “Rocky,” “Braveheart,” “Chef,” “Indiana Jones,” etc. While it can sound like its downplaying the work done in these films, far from it as many works that could be labeled as such are also lauded, some of them even being some of the best films of their respective years. Joseph Kosinski (“Top Gun: Maverick,” “Tron: Legacy”) has made a few of these before, and he’s back working within territory he’s quite familiar with in another tale of high-octane vehicular thrills in “F1.”

Set in the world of high-octane Formula 1 competitive racing, the film follows aged former-F1 driver Sonny Hayes, played by Brad Pitt (“Fight Club,” “Ocean’s Eleven (2001)”), who finds himself invited back into the sport by his longtime friend and former-F1 driver turned team owner Ruben Cervantes, played by Javier Bardem (“Dune (2021),” “No Country for Old Men”). Ruben’s team has yet to win a race, and he invites Hayes in to race in his second car, as well as to give his rookie driver Joshua Pearce, played by Damson Idris (“Snowfall,” “Outside the Wire”), a mentor-like figure to work alongside. Hayes soon finds himself butting heads with every member of the team, including Pearce, Pearce’s mother Bernadette, played by Sara Niles (“Ted Lasso,” “Beautiful People”), the team’s technical director Kate McKenna, played by Kerry Condon (“Better Call Saul,” “The Banshees of Inisherin”), the team’s principal Kaspar Smolinski, played by Kim Bodnia (“Killing Eve,” “The Bridge”).

Kosinski’s previous experience with grand scales will obviously help with a project like this, but he showcases a true mastery of the technical arts here. The film is constantly whipping between static and moving shots, whirling around the tracks with a choreographed reckless abandoned. Despite the numerous vehicles racing and crashing around, cinematographer Claudio Miranda (“Top Gun: Maverick,” “Life of Pi”) sets it up like a ballet. The same touch extends to the moments outside of the cars, and it creates a tonal symbiosis between the different worlds of the film and sport. Hans Zimmer’s (“The Dark Knight,” “The Lion King (1994)”) thunderous and phenomenal musical score provides a backdrop to the dance of speed that zooms across the screen throughout the two-hour-and-thirty-five-minute-long runtime.

Pitt and Idris are a fantastic duo, complimenting each other's styles of acting just like their characters do on the racetracks. Pitt’s weaponize lackadaisical charm is put to great use here, as is Idris’s young hotshot attitude. Condon and Bardem are also used perfectly, with each exuding charm at every moment and bouncing fantastically off Pitt. The entire supporting cast is put to great use; none of them ever fall by the wayside, with each getting their own little moment in the spotlight. The only one who gets cut a bit short is Tobias Menzies (“Rome,” “Outlander”) as Peter, one of the board members for Ruben’s F1 team. Nothing about his portrayal or character is bad by any means, but it also doesn’t stand out in any way either.

The excellent technical elements and performances all help to glisten up what is a rather routine script. Co-written by Kosinski and Ehren Kruger (“The Ring (2002),” “Top Gun: Maverick”), while the dialogue is snappy and the pacing is borderline perfect, the individual character arcs and archetypes are lifted straight out of every other film with this similar plot. There’s certainly nothing wrong with that, and the actors do exceptional work with the material regardless. However, at no point does the film ever feel truly unexpected. It’s then a testament to Kosinski’s directorial skills, as he manages to wrap you up in the tension and thrills of it all so much, you won’t have time to pay attention to how predictable it can feel.

F1” is a super-charged surprise. From the exceptionally charming and talented cast to the gorgeous cinematography and production values, Kosinski’s latest film continues his streak of turning in some of the best blockbuster entertainment out there. Even if its plot isn’t anything particularly new, it's been supped up to a scale fitting this kind of work. Think of it like this: it's a car full of well-worn and used parts but gussied and revved up to run and sound like it never has before. 4.5/5

Elio - Review: The Heart of the Stars

 

For as long as it has existed, Pixar has been a studio with plenty of hits and plenty of behind-the-scenes issues. When “Elio” was first announced back in 2022, it had a different plot and director to the version now playing in theaters, and there is some irony to the fact that a tale like this was almost abandoned and restarted at some point during production. With a pair of new directors/co-writers Madeline Sharafian (“We Bare Bears”) and Domee Shi (“Turning Red”) and co-writers Julia Cho (“Turning Red”), Mark Hammer (“Shotgun Wedding,” “Two Night Stand”), Mike Jones (“Soul,” “Luca”), and a new crack at the story, Pixar’s latest seems to have faced quite the uphill battle even before arriving in theaters.

The film follows the titular eleven-year-old boy Elio, played by Yonas Kibreab (“Merry Little Batman”), living with his aunt Olga, played by Zoe Saldaña (“Guardians of the Galaxy,” “Avatar”), after the death of his parents. After constantly butting heads with his aunt, Elio is unexpectedly whisked into deep space to the Communiverse: a grand meeting of representatives from all corners of the galaxy. As the believed leader of Earth, he volunteers to attempt to broker negotiations between the Communiverse and the violent warmonger Lord Grigon, played by Brad Garett (“Everybody Loves Raymond,” “Gleason”). However, things go awry after Elio meets Grigon’s pacifist son Glordon, played by Remy Edgerly.

As one can expect from Pixar at this point, there’s a hearty dose of emotional catharsis on display throughout all of “Elio.” The film spends a lot of its runtime examining Elio’s loneliness and the healthy and unhealthy ways he attempts to counter it. The third act in particular draws heavily from these ideas, and the connections explored between Elio and Olga and Elio and Glordon are the film at its absolute best. The writers have a gift for getting into the details of these conversations and that, mixed with Pixar’s highly detailed animations, make for a movie that nails the same kind of emotional ballet that the studio has always been known for. It might not be their most unique work, but it all comes together by the end and it's effective, nevertheless.

Kibreab is an absolutely fantastic, charming, and funny protagonist that carries the film on his short shoulders. He gives one of the better child voice acting performances in recent memory, and he has excellent chemistry with Saldaña and Edgerly. Saldaña as well, for all her preexisting science fiction work, taps into something here that’s far more emotionally grounded than a lot of her previous works and definitely a step above the typical celebrity voice acting most Hollywood animated films are saddled with. Edgerly is also great, though his character feels a bit more two-dimensional than Elio, and the rest of the film is peppered with very funny, but scant vocal roles from various character actors such as Brendan Hunt (“We’re the Millers,” “Ted Lasso”), Naomi Watanabe (“Sailor Moon Eternal”), Shirley Henderson (“Trainspotting,” “Stan & Ollie”), Ana de la Reguera (“Nacho Libre,” “The Forever Purge”), and Matthias Schweighöfer (“Army of the Dead,” “Valkyrie”).

There’s a typically gorgeous amount of animation on display, but “Elio” has a decidedly smaller scale than previous Pixar fare. Ironic given that it's set on Earth and in outer space, but it is confined mostly to a handful of locations, letting each breathe with specific details and aesthetics. A lively electronic musical score from Rob Simonsen (“500 Days of Summer,” “Deadpool & Wolverine”) is peppered throughout and helps to further establish the film’s identity. The film’s auditory identity is particularly excellent, not just with its musical score but the sound design and use of a reoccurring Carl Sagan quote as well.

Among other Hollywood animation studios, Pixar has always maintained a very specific, “calmer” vibe with its films, avoiding pop culture or meme references embraced by some other studios. But even among their own films, “Elio” has a different vibe. The film embraces different feelings of loneliness and at times can almost have an atmospheric, peaceful nature that sets it apart from the rest of the studio’s catalog. While those vibes and ideas do make it different, it explores them in much the same way most other animated family films do. Meaning the meat of the film is interesting and clearly something different, but it's just prepared in a plainer way.

“Elio” continues Pixar’s streak of excellent, thought provoking, emotional animated adventures anyone can enjoy. While it might not be as creatively told as some of the studio’s best, you’d still be hard pressed not to enjoy this meditative, funny, and thoroughly charming tale of loneliness and exploration amongst the stars. 4.5/5

KPop Demon Hunters - Review: Don't Think TWICE about this BANGer New Animated Musical Adventure

 

You’ll be hard pressed to find an animation studio more in the good graces of the film community than Sony Pictures Animation. A handful of duds like “The Emoji Movie” and the live action/animated “Smurfs” movies haven’t dampened the acclaim given to the studio for innovating within their franchise films like “Hotel Transylvania” and the “Spider-Verse” series and championing more director driven creative fare like “The Mitchells vs. The Machines” and “Surf’s Up.” Now, the latest film is a combination of the same hyper-stylized animation the studio is known for and one of the fastest growing music genres worldwide to create a wholly unique blend to tell the story of a group of “KPop Demon Hunters.”

The film follows Huntrix, a KPop group made up of leader Rumi, played by Arden Cho (“Teen Wolf (2014),” “Partner Track”), writer/rapper Zoey, played by Ji-young Yoo (“Until Dawn (2025),” “Expats”), and aggressive vocalist Mira, played by May Hong (“Tales of the City,” “Full Circle”). While a world famous Kpop group on the surface, they secretly protect the world from demons seeking to invade and steal souls, led by the demon king Gwi-Ma, played by Lee Byung-hun (“Masquerade,” “Squid Game”). After years of failure, one of Gwi-Ma's demons Jinu, played by Ahn Hyo-seop (“Dr. Romantic,” “A Time Called You”), develops a new idea to take over the world: disguise a group of demons as a Kpop boy band to take attention away from Huntrix and slowly steal the souls of their fans.

Like virtually every single other film by the studio, this latest from Sony Pictures Animation is a visual feast for the senses. Just like “Spider-Verse” embraced the techniques employed by comics and “Mitchells” embraced the doodles from within a teen’s notebook, “Demon Hunters” fully embraces the techniques and style of anime and manga. Characters ebb and flow with detailed dance choreography, while also popping forth with exaggerated expressions and overacting that has been a staple of series like “One Piece” and “Dragonball Z” since their inception. The way these traditionally two-dimensional elements are brought into this three-dimensional world is just fantastic to watch. It also means the action is equally as great, with highly stylized fights working as music video sequences in their own right.

Those fights are legitimately blended with music, and the film’s attitude towards artistic expression and the power of music is fused through the entire project. It makes for a film that isn’t just funny and cool to watch but has something to say about the commercialization of the music industry and the fabrication of boy/girl groups. It’s nothing groundbreaking, but it's just enough meat to go with the rest of the film’s blast of colorful fun. Directors/co-writers Chris Appelhans (“Wish Dragon”) and Maggie Kang and co-writers Danya Jimenez and Hannah McMechan put a lot into fleshing out the central conflict and the friendship between the central trio. Beyond the characters and world building, there’s also quite a bit of examinations about the power of music as a spiritual connection. The film shares a good deal of DNA with this year’s earlier hit “Sinners” in that way, and it makes the musical sequences and the usage of songs during the fight sequences stand out more.

Cho, Yoo, and Hong do a fantastic job at breathing life into these characters, running wild with their close-knit friendship and the film’s silly sense of humor. They work well together, and it's a treat to watch them bounce off each other in moments of borderline improv and then come back around for the film’s serious emotional moments. The way they embrace the wackier humor is truly endearing and makes each one of them stand out as a real, believable friend group. Hyo-seop also makes for an entertaining and sympathetic villain who clearly has more going on than just being a typical evil puppet. Byung-hun is a menacing treat used sparingly, and Ken Jeong (“Community,” “The Hangover”) appears as Huntrix’s manager Bobby in a role that makes great use of his comedic talents without relying on using his voice in a grating way.

Thanks to the world building and animation, “Demon Hunters” can easily be enjoyed by anyone whether they know BTS as a group of young musical heartthrobs or just the abbreviation for “behind the scenes.” It feels like the rare animated film that will catch people off guard and truly have something for everyone. With an excellent voice cast and a gorgeous aesthetic, toe-tapping tunes, and a quick pace, “KPop Demon Hunters” wields its style like a weapon as deadly as those used by its central trio. It’s another massive hit for Sony Pictures Animation and easily stands as one of the best animated films of the year. 4.5/5

Materialists - Review: Living in a Materialistic World

 

Celine Song’s directorial debut “Past Lives” set the world on fire during the 2023 Oscars season thanks to its exploration of modern relationships, romances, and intimacy set against a backdrop of longing and long-distance friendships. Her follow-up explores many of the same things, with a New York City setting, a cast of attractive big-name actors, a clear inspirational throwback to the romance films of the early 2000s, and the concept of “matchmaking” squarely in her sights. 

Lucy, played by Dakota Johnson (“Fifty Shades of Grey,” “Cha Cha Real Smooth”), is a matchmaker at the Adore agency living in New York City paycheck to paycheck. At the wedding of one of her clients, she meets Harry Castillo, played by Pedro Pascal (“The Mandalorian,” “Gladiator II”), the wealthy brother of her client’s new husband, and she reconnects with John, played by Chris Evans (“Knives Out,” “Captain America: The Winter Soldier”), her broke, cater-waiter, failed actor, ex-boyfriend. As she connects and re-connects with each of them, she’s forced to re-examine what her definitions of love and connection actually mean, all while dealing with a devastating complication with one of her clients Sophie, played by Zoë Winters (“Succession,” “Jules”). 

Johnson, Pascal, and Evans all make for an exceptionally charming and entertaining romantic trio. Johnson in particular makes great use of her subtler skills and makes Lucy a complex lead to root for. You truly have no idea which way she’ll go throughout the film, and there’s an evolution of her character and beliefs that results in a satisfying and emotionally complex arc for her. Pascal and Evans are a bit more one note, given that they aren’t the central roles in the film, but they clearly are having a ton of fun playing right into the romance cliches of their characters. Winters also does a great job with her minor role, excelling especially when she’s placed alongside Johnson. The use of the character herself is more up in the air, but Winters’ skill is never in question. 

Song’s script moves playfully back and forth between embracing the cliches of this genre while still spending ample time playing within it. She has a lot to say about the expectations and restraints of modern dating, and Johnson’s character serves as a mouthpiece for this. It never feels preachy or over-blown, but the film does get into plenty of “having its cake and eating it too” territory towards the end. Regardless, the individual dialogue itself is snappy and fun, with Pascal, Evans, and Johnson all delivering it with charm and energy. It’s also simply a gorgeous film, one that makes excellent use of New York City and its various locales, indoors and out. Cinematographer Shabier Kirchner (“Small Axe,” “Past Lives”) shoots it all with the skill of a grounded drama without dampening any of the glitz and flair. The musical score from Daniel Pemberton (“Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse,” “The Trial of the Chicago 7”) is also a frothy highlight; like the script, it seeks to emulate the iconic scores of other early 2000s romance films while also playing quite a bit within the expected sound.

Things are all well and good until Sophie’s subplot is introduced. While Song’s intentions are clearly good and the subplot is written with care, it juxtaposes the rest of the film so drastically that it creates a severe case of tonal whiplash. It has nothing to do with Johnson or Winters’ performances, but merely the fact that the tone and seriousness of the development clashes with the rest of the film. By the end, things wrap up nicely, but it can at times feel like a delicious cupcake with a carrot in the middle: great on their own, together less so until you get used to them.

“Materialists” is a sugary sweet follow-up for Celine Song that demonstrates her continued strength withdissectingg modern day romantic relationships. Her cast are all great together, and the film is exceptionally gorgeous with equally great music. As a total package, it has some disparate elements and doesn’t quite reach as highly as her previous effort. But for those looking for a romance that feels like it was plucked out of a bygone era, it's an easy recommendation. 4/5

How to Train Your Dragon (2025) - Review: Faithful to a Fault

 

Way back in 1998, Gus Vant Sant, a director who made a name for himself with honest, human dramas like “Good Will Hunting” and “My Own Private Idaho” directed a shot-for-shot remake of Alfred Hitchcock’s classic thriller film “Psycho.” That remake, also titled “Psycho,” was mostly lambasted as a pointless exercise in creatively bankrupt filmmaking. That film was at least remaking one that was almost 30 years old. This shot-for-shot remake does share one of the same directors as its original film, one of the same writers of the same film, and many of the same production crew members as well. We’ll see if that will make it matter any more.

“How to Train Your Dragon” follows young awkward Viking Hiccup, played by Mason Thames (“The Black Phone,” “Incoming”), the son of the manly and strong chief of the Isle of Berk Stoick, played by Gerard Butler (“300,” “Olympus Has Fallen”). The Vikings of Berk are constantly beseeched by deadly dragons constantly attacking their town and Hiccup one night manages to down one of the deadliest: a Night Fury. After finding that the creature is really nothing to be afraid of, he begins to slowly learn how to tame various dragons using non-violent methods, attracting the attention of star Dragon killing pupil Astrid, played by Nico Parker (“Dumbo (2019),” “Suncoast”), local mechanic and dragon killing teacher Gobber, played by Nick Frost (“Shaun of the Dead,” “Hot Fuzz”), and the newfound adoration of Hiccup’s father.

At its core, this is very much the same story of an outsider finding his place in the world, of differing forms of masculinity, of respecting nature, and of father and son bonds. In fact, despite some minor tweaks, DeBlois has on record stated that they used the same script as the original animated film. This leads into some confusing decisions and dialogue that works far better in an exaggerated animated environment than it does in a live action one. Lines that flowed better and faster in the original feel stilted and awkward in live-action. The handful of moments that are changed are done so in bizarre ways that stand out: quick lines referring to Vikings from “sun baked tribes” or the “silk road” to explain why Berk is more multi-cultural, and a moment where Hiccup tells Astrid not to interfere because his dad “respects her too much” feel very out of place and awkward.

The performances are, across the board, very solid. Frost and Butler are excellent and provide a great sense of presence and character to the entire adventure. Butler clearly loves this character as he voiced Stoick in the original animated film, and the joy and energy in his performance is evident. Parker and Thames are fine enough, but neither is able to break out of the roles. They just come across as adequate impersonations, rather than real, lived performances. The worst offenders come from the gaggle of bullies that befriend Hiccup over the course of his adventure.  Snotlout, Fishlegs, Ruffnut, and Tuffnut, played by Gabriel Howell (“Bodies,” “Nightsleeper”), Julian Dennison (“Deadpool 2,” “Hunt for the Wilderpeople”), Ingerman Bronwyn James (“Wicked,” “Harlots”), and Harry Trevaldwyn (“Ten Percent,” “The Bubble”) respectively, feel as though they come from the Disney Channel school of teen acting. Dennison eventually finds his footing as Fishlegs, but the rest are more annoying than endearing.

John Powell’s (“Kung Fu Panda,” “Happy Feet”) evocative and emotional score is as wonderful as ever, soaring and flying with the scaled beasts it sets to music. At times, it can feel almost muted compared to the original, with some notes and instruments feeling held back compared to the original compositions. The same goes for the film’s visuals, which while detailed and gorgeous, are also far duller than one would expect. What should be grand sweeping vistas of blues, greens, browns, and greys, come across as muddied and swaddled in grey fog and night. For the most part, cinematographer Bill Pope’s (“The Matrix,” “Spider-Man 2”) work here is great, but it consistently feels as though the film’s brightness is turned down to half levels.

Quite simply, it looks and feels like a fan film at worst and a promotional ad for a new theme park at best (I see what you’re doing here, “Epic Universe: Isle of Berk”). The slaven commitment to recreating the original film in look, feel, and literal shots means that, for people who’ve seen the original countless times, there’s nothing new here. There can’t be “easter eggs” for fans of the original when everything must be exactly as it was before. And things come across so stilted and soulless that it will likely confuse those who’ve never seen the original and came in expecting to see the tale they’ve heard is one of the greatest animated films of this century.

It feels odd, given the negative connotations of the rest of this review, but this live action remake of “How to Train Your Dragon” is a harmless affair that mostly manages to recapture the charm of the original film without ever soaring close to as high as any film in the franchise, let alone the original. However, in attempting to retell the same tale just in a live action format, DeBlois has effectively made what is a high school production to the original film’s Broadway production. It’s the same song and dance, but it can’t help but pale in comparison to what came before in virtually every way. 3.5/5

The Life of Chuck - Review: The Story of a Life

 

Your average moviegoer might be immediately scared away by the prospect of a Stephen King film, given the writer’s penchant for creating some of the most horrifying tales of modern horror. From “IT” to “The Shining” to “Carrie” to “Christine” to many many more, he’s definitely left a mark on the film and literary horror landscape. However, he’s also told many tales that are decidedly less horrific and even life-affirming, from “The Green Mile” to “The Shawshank Redemption” to “Stand by Me,” he’s no stranger to making life seem as magical just as much as he can make it seem horrific. Writer/director Mike Flanagan (“The Haunting of Hill House,” “Doctor Sleep”) is no stranger to adapting King’s works and he’s also now making a pivot to decidedly lighter works with an adaptation of King’s short story “The Life of Chuck.”

Told using a non-linear plot and narrated by Nick Offerman (“Parks and Recreation,” “Heart Beats Loud”), the film follows the titular Charles Krantz, played as a child by Benjamin Pajak, a teen as Jacob Tremblay (“Room,” “Wonder”), and as an adult by Tom Hiddleston (“Loki,” “The Night Manager”), as he grows up, highlighting various specific elements of his life, such as moving in with his grandfather Albie, played by Mark Hamill (“Star Wars,” “Batman: The Animated Series”), and grandmother Sarah, played by Mia Sara (“Ferris Bueller’s Day Off,” “Legend”), a high school dance, and dancing to a drumming busker Taylor with Janice, played by The Pocket Queen and Annalise Basso (“Oculus,” “The Red Road”), respectively. Meanwhile, part of the film features Chiwetel Ejiofor (“12 Years a Slave,” “Doctor Strange”) as schoolteacher Marty and Karen Gillan (“Guardians of the Galaxy,” “Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle”) as nurse Felicia who both attempt to piece together who Chuck is after a billboard thanking him appears in their town.

Flanagan has made great strides in adapting this tale in as straightforward a way as possible. Not only are some sequences taken verbatim from the original short story, but the overall calm, almost ethereal nature of it all remains intact. The feeling that “The Life of Chuck” evokes is nothing sort of bizarre: it's a film that feels at peace rather than a peaceful film itself, like the feeling evoked when walking through a calm hospital hallway. It's certainly unique, but it can also feel too at ease, as if the film itself has no stakes. It certainly does, and it builds to an exceptionally interesting and life-affirming conclusion. But at the same time, it leaves one with a simple, pleasant feeling of “that was good” rather than any sort of strong, or even overwhelming emotion. The musical score, composed by The Newton Brothers (“Oculus,” “Doctor Sleep”), maintains that same level of quiet, peaceful ambience, almost like a ghostly whisper setting you at ease with a great deal of beauty.

The film is also shot with an exceptionally calm demeanor by cinematographer Eben Bolter (“Avenue 5,” “Tea with the Dames”), gliding between scenes and folding in different aspect ratios and colors schemes. Sometimes it embraces a dayglo atmosphere, sometimes it's more downtrodden and flat. It's an interesting aesthetic, but it prevents the film from really standing out in a specific way. It speaks to an unfortunate issue at the center of the project. For as sweet, calm, and life-affirming as the film is, it proves to be too much so. What starts as a unique balm for the soul kind of a film ends up being something too slight, too calm, that it fails to really register an impression in the viewer's mind.

The performances are excellent across the board. A cast of committed performers helps breathe life into a story that could have otherwise been considered remarkably melodramatic. Ejiofor and Gillan have excellent chemistry together in the first act, and for a mostly wordless dance-based second act, Hiddleston, Basso, and The Pocket Queen make up quite a trio. Hamill also turns in some of his best, most calming grandfatherly work of his career. It's a lot of very sweet, smiley performances that all come together to create a very warm embrace kind of ensemble.

There’s certainly something to be said for a film that seems to desire to be the complete inverse of a typical Hollywood project. Instead of seeking to excite or overwhelm, “The Life of Chuck” is a movie that might initially worry some, before slowly transitioning to a work meant to be a calming, self-affirming piece of cinema. It certainly does do exactly that, and it does so with great performances, gorgeous cinematography and music, and all-around excellent production quality. However, in doing so, it fails to make a true impact on the viewer besides simply residing in the realm of being a “nice time.” Which isn’t anything to sneeze at, but with a film that just seeks to accomplish, your mileage may vary. 4/5

Predator: Killer of Killers - Review: Leader of the Pack

 

There’s something beautiful about the 21st century’s newfound respect for animation. What was previously seen as a medium relegated strictly to family fare or kid’s entertainment has now blossomed into a far wider variety of material, thanks to the increase in adult-aimed animated material as well as animated series based on live-action franchises like “Men in Black,” “Beetlejuice,” and “Ghostbusters.” This means that more franchises are embracing the medium despite originating in live-action, with the likes of the “Spider-Verse” films and now “Predator” getting into the mix.

“Predator: Killer of Killers” is an anthology films focusing on three different periods in human history and three different encounters with a deadly Predator at those different times: a Viking warrior named Ursa, played by Lindsay LaVanchy (“Initiation (2020)”), in Scandanavia in 841, a Japanese samurai named Kenji, played by Louis Ozawa (“Hunters,” “Predators”), in 17th century Japan, and a World War 2 pilot named Torres, played by Rick Gonzalez (“Arrow,” “Coach Carter”), in 1941. Each faces off against a different Predator, with different weapons utilized by the alien hunter and the human warrior in their various face-offs.

Without a doubt, the smartest thing that director/co-writer Dan Trachtenberg (“10 Cloverfield Lane,” “Prey”) and co-writer Micho Robert Rutare (“Z-Nation”) do is keep things relatively simple. There’s no reinvention of the typical “Predator” mythos or formula here. Rather, the simple premise of going back through human history provides a shot in the arm in much the same way that “Prey” did a few years back. Simply juxtaposing different human weaponry against the science-fiction brutality of the Predator species allows for some thrilling and creative battles that are animated in a detailed and gorgeous style that still manages to be grimy, as if everything is sketched out with thick black markers.

The vocal performances, while few, are all excellent. LaVanchy has a guttural and commanding presence, Ozawa delivers a cool and controlled character, and Gonzalez, playing the youngest of the trio, manages to make his more anxious, inexperienced persona endearing without becoming annoying. The titular Predators are just as menacing as they’ve ever been, now accentuated with varying styles befitting the animation medium, and their roars, coupled with the film’s excellent sound design and score from composer Benjamin Wallfisch (“IT (2017),” “Blade Runner 2049”), create a thoroughly entertaining animated playground of violence.

This isn’t just a display of cartoon bloodshed though. Rather, the nature of the anthology means that the film manages to showcase not only the different weapons and techniques of violence from history but hit on three different emotional beats throughout the film. There’s a surprising amount of restraint in the violence (this is still a “Predator” film though), and there’s a specific use of the more intense moments of gore and viscera that prevents things from becoming overwhelming while also giving the moments when they do more impact. That, coupled with the film’s excellent usage of color (especially green), makes this feel like far more than a straight-to-streaming spin-off tale. The last fourth of the film especially turns things around not only on the central ideas of violence Trachtenberg and Rutare were playing with before but also makes for a far more satisfying ending than most anthology films get. It does end with a sequel tease that feels deliberate and obvious, if not a little bit annoying, but the promise of more of this creative, cool take on the franchise isn’t a bad one by any means.

“Predator: Killer of Killers” is a surprising high point for the franchise, sitting nicely right alongside the original film and 2022’s “Prey” as the best of the series and continuing the stretch of goodwill garnered from the success of that 2022 entry. The animated world, surprising emotional angles, and vocal performances help make this a new twist on the formula as entertaining as the series has ever been. Hopefully this proves that “Prey” wasn’t a fluke, and the new blood injected into the franchise can last for a long while to come. 4.5/5